Extended-pulsed fidaxomicin bests vancomycin for C diff in older people

Reuters Health Information: Extended-pulsed fidaxomicin bests vancomycin for C diff in older people

Extended-pulsed fidaxomicin bests vancomycin for C diff in older people

Last Updated: 2018-01-05

By Will Boggs MD

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Extended-pulsed fidaxomicin, delivering 20 doses over a longer time period after initial daily dosing, appears superior to standard-dose vancomycin for sustained cure of Clostridium difficile infection in patients age 60 or older, according to results from an open-label randomized trial.

The narrow-spectrum macrolide antibiotic fidaxomicin (200 mg orally twice daily for 10 days) has been shown to be noninferior to standard vancomycin (125 mg orally four times daily for 10 days) for treating C. difficile infection, with reduced recurrence rates and improved sustained clinical cure rates.

In the EXTEND trial, Dr. Benoit Guery from the University of Lausanne, in Switzerland, and colleagues investigated whether extended-pulsed fidaxomicin improved sustained clinical-cure rates, compared with vancomycin, in a study of 364 hospitalized patients age 60 or older with C. difficile infection.

Significantly more patients in the extended-pulsed fidaxomicin group (70%) than in the vancomycin group (59%) had sustained clinical cure at 30 days after the end of treatment, the researchers report in The Lancet Infectious Diseases, online December 19.

More patients in the extended-pulsed fidaxomicin group also achieved the secondary efficacy endpoint of sustained clinical cure at days 40, 55, and 90.

In multivariate analysis, patients with severe C. difficile infection were less likely to achieve sustained clinical cure than were patients with nonsevere C. difficile infection.

Thirty days after the end of treatment (day 55 for extended-pulsed fidaxomicin and day 40 for vancomycin), recurrence rates were significantly lower with extended-pulsed fidaxomicin (4%) than with vancomycin (17%).

Gut bacterial alpha diversity increased to a greater extent in extended-pulsed fidaxomicin-treated patients than in vancomycin-treated patients.

Otherwise, the safety profiles for the two regimens appeared similar.

"Since the extended-pulsed regimen of fidaxomicin administers the same number of tablets as the standard regimen, the observed benefits are derived with no increase in treatment costs and with a similar positive safety profile to that of standard-regimen vancomycin and fidaxomicin," the researchers note.

Dr. Dale N. Gerding from Edward Hines Jr. Veterans Affairs Hospital, in Hines, Illinois, who wrote an accompanying editorial, told Reuters Health by email, "Recurrence rates in the EXTEND study were lower for both vancomycin and fidaxomicin than they were in the earlier licensing trials; hence the difference in recurrence rate in EXTEND (-15.5%) is only slightly better than the difference in recurrence in the two prior trials (-14.2% and -9.9%), albeit with an older patient population that was randomized but treated open-label."

"This trial done open label also is not as convincing as it would be if done blinded, and fidaxomicin remains an expensive treatment for C. difficile infection," he said.

"Pulsed dosing of either fidaxomicin or vancomycin is useful in reducing recurrence and should be employed more often in patients who are at high risk for recurrence, and this includes patients 65 or older," Dr. Gerding concluded.

Astellas Pharma funded the study, employed five of the authors, and had various relationships with several others.

Dr. Guery did not respond to a request for comment.

SOURCES: http://bit.ly/2F2oFOe and http://bit.ly/2qspa0S

Lancet Infect Dis 2017.

© Copyright 2013-2019 GI Health Foundation. All rights reserved.
This site is maintained as an educational resource for US healthcare providers only. Use of this website is governed by the GIHF terms of use and privacy statement.