Abstract

Fecal Incontinence Symptoms and Impact in Older Versus Younger Women Seeking Care

Meyer I1, Blanchard CT2, Markland AD3, Gibson EG4, Richter HE1. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 Jun;62(6):733-738. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001353.

 
     

Author information

Division of Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.

Birmingham/Atlanta Geriatrics, Research, Education, and Clinical Center at the Birmingham VA Medical Center, Departments of Medicine, Division of Gerontology, Geriatrics and Palliative Care, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.

School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The differential impact of aging on fecal incontinence symptom severity and condition-specific quality of life remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to characterize differences in symptom distress, quality of life, and anorectal physiology assessments in older versus younger women with fecal incontinence.

DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study.

SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a tertiary genitorectal disorder clinic.

PATIENTS: Women presenting for fecal incontinence evaluation between 2003 and 2016 were classified as older or younger based on age ≥65 or <65 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcomes were symptom-specific quality of life and distress measured by validated questionnaires (the Modified Manchester Health Questionnaire containing the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index); anorectal physiology and anatomy were assessed by manometry and endoanal ultrasound.

RESULTS: Of 879 subjects, 286 and 593 were classified as older and younger (mean ages, 71.4 ± 5.3 y and 51.3 ± 10.5 y). Solid stool leakage was more frequent in older women (83.2% vs 76.7%; p = 0.03), whereas liquid stool leakage (83.2% vs 82.8%; p = 0.88) and fecal urgency (76.9% vs 78.8%; p = 0.54) did not differ between groups. Mean symptom severity scores were similar between groups (28.0 ± 11.9 and 27.6 ± 13.5; p = 0.69); however, there was greater negative impact on quality of life among younger women (46.3 ± 22.0 vs 51.8 ± 21.8; p < 0.01). Multivariable linear regression controlling for pertinent covariates revealed younger age as an independent predictor for worse condition-specific quality-of-life scores (p < 0.01). Squeeze pressures were similar between groups, whereas younger women had greater resting pressures and higher rates of sphincter defects (external, 7.7% vs 20.2%; internal, 12.2% vs 26.8%; both p < 0.01).

LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its lack of patient obstetric history and the duration of their incontinence symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS: Characteristics differ between older and younger women seeking care for fecal incontinence. The differential impact and age-related phenotypes may provide useful information for patient counseling and developing management algorithms for women with fecal incontinence.

© Copyright 2013-2019 GI Health Foundation. All rights reserved.
This site is maintained as an educational resource for US healthcare providers only. Use of this website is governed by the GIHF terms of use and privacy statement.