Abstract

Dietary Intervention Trial Design in Patients With an Ileoanal Pouch: Lessons From a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Feeding Study.

Ardalan, Zaid S (ZS);Sparrow, Miles P (MP);Rohani, Faran (F);Gibson, Peter R (PR);Yao, Chu K (CK);

 
     

Author information

JGH Open.2025 Oct 05;9(10):e70287.doi:10.1002/jgh3.70287

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to assess the effects of a whole diet strategy, a Monash Pouch Diet (MPD), on pouch-related symptoms, inflammation, quality of life, and stool characteristics in a cohort of patients with symptomatic pouches and a history of pouchitis compared with a typical Australian pouch diet.

METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled dietary feeding trial, patients with ileoanal pouches received either a Monash Pouch diet or a typical Australian diet for 7 weeks. Clinical scores (Pouch Disease Activity Index, PDAI), pouch symptoms, tolerability, fecal calprotectin, and quality of life were measured pre- and post-intervention. The primary outcome consisted of the proportion of patients achieving symptomatic remission (clinical PDAI ≤ 2).

RESULTS: All patients on the MPD experienced worsening symptoms, and the trial was terminated early. The majority of the participants reported partial adherence (50%-80%) and poor tolerability (median: 40 mm). Quality of life outcomes were highly variable across dietary arms, and fecal indices showed no consistent trends related to diet.

CONCLUSION: This double-blinded, placebo-controlled, dietary feeding trial failed to determine the effect of the Monash Pouch Diet on pouchitis but suggests that the design of dietary trials for pouch patients requires careful consideration.

© Copyright 2013-2026 GI Health Foundation. All rights reserved.
This site is maintained as an educational resource for US healthcare providers only. Use of this website is governed by the GIHF terms of use and privacy statement.