Abstract

When Perfect Is the Enemy of Good: Results of a RAND Appropriateness Panel on Treat to Target in Asymptomatic Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Am J Gastroenterol. 2025 Feb 1;120(2):420-430. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002964.Epub 2024 Jul 15.

Hannah K Systrom 1Victoria Rai 2Siddharth Singh 3Leonard Baidoo 4Adam S Cheifetz 5Shane M Devlin 6Krisztina B Gecse 7Peter M Irving 8Gilaad G Kaplan 6Patricia L Kozuch 9Thomas Ullman 10Miles P Sparrow 11Gil Y Melmed 12Corey A Siegel 1

 
     

Author information

1Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Lebanon, New Hampshire USA.

2Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut USA.

3University of California San Diego, Division of Gastroenterology, San Diego, California USA.

4University of Tennessee College of Medicine, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Memphis, Tennessee USA.

5Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

6University of Calgary, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

7Amsterdam University Medical Center, Gastroenterology, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

8Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospitals, Gastroenterology, London, United Kingdom.

9Jefferson University, Division of Gastroenterology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US.

10Montefiore Medical Center, Division of Gastroenterology, Bronx, New York, USA.

11The Alfred Hospital, IBD Unit, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

12Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Los Angeles, California USA .

Abstract

Background: A treat-to-target strategy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) recommends iterative treatment adjustments to achieve clinical and endoscopic remission. In asymptomatic patients with ongoing endoscopic activity, the risk/benefit balance of this approach is unclear, particularly with prior exposure to advanced therapies.

Methods: Using the RAND/University of California Los Angeles Appropriateness Method, 9 IBD specialists rated appropriateness of changing therapy in 126 scenarios of asymptomatic patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease and active endoscopic disease. Disease extent and behavior, prior treatment, prior complications, and recent disease progression were considered, as were factors that might influence decision-making, including age and pregnancy. Ratings were collected through anonymous survey, discussed at an in-person meeting, and finalized in a second anonymous survey.

Results: Panelists rated change in therapy as appropriate (i.e., expected benefit sufficiently outweighs potential harms from continuing therapy) in 96/126 scenarios, generally in patients with progressive, complicated, and/or extensive disease, while changing therapy was rated uncertain in 27 scenarios of mild and/or stable disease. Changing therapy was rated inappropriate in ulcerative colitis patients with mild and stable disease previously exposed to ≥3 therapies or with improved endoscopic activity, and in Crohn's disease patients with only scattered aphthous ulcers. The validated threshold for disagreement was not crossed for any scenario. Patient age older than 65 years and a plan for pregnancy in the next year might influence decision-making in some settings.

Discussion: Appropriateness ratings can help guide clinical decision-making about changing therapy to achieve endoscopic remission in asymptomatic patients with IBD until data from ongoing randomized studies are available.

© Copyright 2013-2025 GI Health Foundation. All rights reserved.
This site is maintained as an educational resource for US healthcare providers only. Use of this website is governed by the GIHF terms of use and privacy statement.