Author information 1Department of General and Oncologic Surgery, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I, Largo Turati 62, 10100, Torino, Italy. Electronic address: mmineccia@mauriziano.it. 2Department of General and Oncologic Surgery, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I, Largo Turati 62, 10100, Torino, Italy. 3Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Bologna, Italy; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Italy. 4Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20072, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy. 5Depertment of Colorectal Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS Università' Cattolica S. Cuore, Roma, Italy. 6Colorectal? and General Surgery, Ospedale Santa Maria delle Croci, Viale Randi, 5, 48121, Ravenna, Italy. 7Department of General Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Negrar di Valpolicella Verona, Italy; Department of IBD Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Negrar di Valpolicella Verona, Italy. 8Department of General Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Negrar di Valpolicella Verona, Italy. 9Department of General Surgery, Ospedale di Pordenone, ASFO, Via Montereale 24, Pordenone, Italy. 10University of Naples, Federico II, Via Pansini 5, Napoli, Italy. 11Departement of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery. Università e Policlinico Tor Vergata. Torvergata, Rome, Italy. 12Department of Surgery, ASST Rhodense. Ospedale di Rho, Monumento ai Caduti. Corso Europa, 250, 20017, Rho, Milano, Italy. 13Department? of General and Oncologic Surgery, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I, Largo Turati 62, 10100, Torino, Italy. 14Surgery? of the Alimentary Tract, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Bologna, Italy; Department? of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Italy. 15Department? of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20072, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; IRCCS? Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy. 16Department? of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20072, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; IRCCS? Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; General? Surgery Department, Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas "Norberto Quirno" (CEMIC), Argentina. 17Depertment? of Colorectal Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS Università' Cattolica S. Cuore, Roma, Italy. 18Colorectal and General Surgery, Ospedale Santa Maria delle Croci, Viale Randi, 5, 48121, Ravenna, Italy. 19Department? of General Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Negrar di Valpolicella Verona, Italy; Department? of IBD Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Negrar di Valpolicella Verona, Italy. 20Department? of IBD Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Negrar di Valpolicella Verona, Italy. 21Department? of General Surgery, Ospedale di Pordenone, ASFO, Via Montereale 24, Pordenone, Italy. 22University? of Naples, Federico II, Via Pansini 5, Napoli, Italy. 23Departement? of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery. Università e Policlinico Tor Vergata. Torvergata, Rome, Italy. 24Department? of Surgery, ASST Rhodense. Ospedale di Rho, Monumento ai Caduti. Corso Europa, 250, 20017, Rho, Milano, Italy. Abstract Background: Available guidelines lack in indications on surgical standard in Ulcerative Colitis (UC) AIMS: To determine the role of surgical strategies of colectomy and proctectomy with pouch-anal-anastomosis (IPAA) on functional outcomes in a nationwide population multicenter study. The secondary aims consisted of perioperative outcomes and complications. Methods: Data on 379 patients who underwent total abdominal colectomy and proctectomy with ileo-pouch-anal-anastomosis (IPAA) with or without diverting ileostomy were retrospectively collected in a red cap multicenter-database searching for variables that could impact on pouch outcomes as cuffitis, pouchitis, anastomotic stenosis, pouch stenosis, failure or pathological Low-Anterior-Resection-Syndrome (LARS) score. Results: Mesocolic dissection sealing vessels at major trunks and from medial to lateral are associated with better outcomes. Laparoscopy is associated with lower rate of cuffitis over time (p = 0.028). Mesentery lengthening is associated with higher pouchitis rate (p = 0.015) and earlier failure (p < 0.0001). Hand-sewn IPAA results in early anastomotic stenosis (p = 0.00011). The Transanal-Transection and Single-Stapling Anastomosis (TTSS) showed to be protective against pouchitis. Extended dissection of adhesions correlates with lower rate of pouchitis-episodes (p = 0.0057). Conclusions: The study highlights advantages of laparoscopy. New techniques such as TTSS promise further improvements. Mesentery lengthening correlates with high risk of pouch-failure and pouchitis, hand-sewn anastomosis increased risk of stenosis. |
© Copyright 2013-2025 GI Health Foundation. All rights reserved.
This site is maintained as an educational resource for US healthcare providers only.
Use of this website is governed by the GIHF terms of use and privacy statement.