Abstract

Intravenous Versus Subcutaneous Infliximab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

J Crohns Colitis. 2024 Sep 3;18(9):1440-1449.doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae059.

John David Chetwood 1 2Yvonne Tran 3Sreedhar Subramanian 4Philip J Smith 5Marisa Iborra 6Anthony Buisson 7 8Sudarshan Paramsothy 1 2 9Rupert W Leong 1 2 9

 
     

Author information

1Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

2Concord Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

3Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

4Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.

5Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.

6Department of Gastroenterology, La Fe University Hospital of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.

7Service d'Hépato-Gastro Entérologie, 3iHP, INSERM, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

8M2iSH, USC-INRA 2018, INSERM U1071, 3iHP, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

9Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Abstract

Background: Subcutaneous [SC] infliximab may provide multiple benefits over intravenous [IV] formulations. However, studies for efficacy and safety in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] have been constrained by small sizes that limit the interpretation of outcomes, particularly for subgroups potentially at high risk of disease relapse.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis up to January 2023, to evaluate the change in clinical remission after transitioning from IV to SC infliximab in patients with IBD in clinical remission. The primary outcome was measured using the relative risk for meta-analysis.

Results: We identified 15 studies of patients established ≥ 3 months on IV infliximab, consisting of 1371 patients and 840 patient-years of follow-up. There was no loss of clinical remission in the IBD cohort overall, Crohn's disease [CD], or perianal CD [p = 0.55 and p = 0.11 at 9-12 months, and p = 0.50 at 6 months, respectively]. Neither prior IV dose [≤ 10 mg/kg 6-weekly] [p = 0.48] nor IBD disease subtype was associated with an increased clinical relapse rate at 6 months (p = 0.48 and p = 0.45 [UC vs CD], respectively).

Conclusion: Changing patients established on IV infliximab to an SC formulation is associated with a high ongoing clinical remission and a low adverse event rate. Furthermore, there are no signals for adverse outcomes among different IBD disease subtypes, nor in those on escalated IV infliximab dosing schedules up to 10 mg/kg 6-weekly. These data should provide patients and clinicians alike with confidence in SC infliximab use in IBD.

© Copyright 2013-2024 GI Health Foundation. All rights reserved.
This site is maintained as an educational resource for US healthcare providers only. Use of this website is governed by the GIHF terms of use and privacy statement.