Food Processing and Risk of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Sep;21(10):2483-2495.e1.doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.01.012. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
Neeraj Narula 1, Nicole H Chang 2, Danah Mohammad 2, Emily C L Wong 2, Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan 3, Simon S M Chan 4, Franck Carbonnel 5, Antoine Meyer 5 |
Author information 1Department of Medicine (Division of Gastroenterology) and Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. Electronic address: Neeraj.narula@medportal.ca. 2Department of Medicine (Division of Gastroenterology) and Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 3Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 4Department of Gastroenterology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital and Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom. 5Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Bicêtre, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris and Université Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France. Abstract Background & aims: Several studies have been published on the association between food processing and risks of Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), with some variability in results. We performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to study this association. Methods: From PubMed, Medline, and Embase until October 2022, we identified cohort studies that studied the association between food processing and the risk of CD or UC. Risk of bias of the included studies was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. We computed pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using random-effects meta-analysis based on estimates and standard errors. Results: A total of 1,068,425 participants were included (13,594,422 person-years) among 5 cohort studies published between 2020 and 2022. Four of the 5 included studies were scored as high quality. The average age of participants ranged from 43 to 56 years; 55%-83% were female. During follow-up, 916 participants developed CD, and 1934 developed UC. There was an increased risk for development of CD for participants with higher consumption of ultra-processed foods compared with those with lower consumption (HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.37-2.14; I2 = 0%) and a lower risk of CD for participants with higher consumption of unprocessed/minimally processed foods compared with those with lower consumption (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53-0.94; I2 = 11%). There was no association between risk of UC and ultra-processed foods (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.86-1.61; I2 = 74%) or unprocessed/minimally processed foods (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.68-1.02; I2 = 0%). Conclusions: Higher ultra-processed food and lower unprocessed/minimally processed food intakes are associated with higher risk of CD but not UC.
|
© Copyright 2013-2024 GI Health Foundation. All rights reserved.
This site is maintained as an educational resource for US healthcare providers only.
Use of this website is governed by the GIHF terms of use and privacy statement.