Personalized Research on Diet in Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease: A Series of N-of-1 Diet Trials Am J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jun 1;117(6):902-917.doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001800. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
Heather C Kaplan 1 2 3, Lisa Opipari-Arrigan 2 3 4, Jiabei Yang 5, Christopher H Schmid 5, Christine L Schuler 3 6, Shehzad A Saeed 7, Kimberly L Braly 8, Fandi Chang 5, Lauren Murphy 2, Cassandra M Dodds 2, Mason Nuding 9, Hao Liu 10, Sheri Pilley 11 12, Julie Stone 11 13, Gisele Woodward 11 14, Nancy Yokois 15, Alka Goyal 16 17, Dale Lee 8, Ann Ming Yeh 17, Peter Lee 18, Benjamin D Gold 14, Zarela Molle-Rios 19, R Jeff Zwiener 20, Sabina Ali 21, Mallory Chavannes 22 23, Tiffany Linville 24, Ashish Patel 25 26, Travis Ayers 27, Mikelle Bassett 28, Brendan Boyle 29, Pablo Palomo 30, Sofia Verstraete 31, Jill Dorsey 32, Jess L Kaplan 33, Steven J Steiner 34, Kaylie Nguyen 35, Jennifer Burgis 31, David L Suskind 8, ImproveCareNow Pediatric IBD Learning Health System |
Author information
Abstract Introduction: Evidence about specific carbohydrate diet (SCD) for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is limited. We conducted 54 single-subject, double-crossover N-of-1 trials comparing SCD with a modified SCD (MSCD) and comparing each with the participant's baseline, usual diet (UD). Methods: Across 19 sites, we recruited patients aged 7-18 years with IBD and active inflammation. Following a 2-week baseline (UD), patients were randomized to 1 of 2 sequences of 4 alternating 8-week SCD and MSCD periods. Outcomes included fecal calprotectin and patient-reported symptoms. We report posterior probabilities from Bayesian models comparing diets. Results: Twenty-one (39%) participants completed the trial, 9 (17%) completed a single crossover, and 24 (44%) withdrew. Withdrawal or early completion occurred commonly (lack of response [n = 11], adverse events [n = 11], and not desiring to continue [n = 6]). SCD and MSCD performed similarly for most individuals. On average, there was <1% probability of a clinically meaningful difference in IBD symptoms between SCD and MSCD. The average treatment difference was -0.3 (95% credible interval -1.2, 0.75). There was no significant difference in the ratio of fecal calprotectin geometric means comparing SCD and MSCD (0.77, 95% credible interval 0.51, 1.10). Some individuals had improvement in symptoms and fecal calprotectin compared with their UD, whereas others did not. Discussion: SCD and MSCD did not consistently improve symptoms or inflammation, although some individuals may have benefited. However, there are inherent difficulties in examining dietary changes that complicate study design and ultimately conclusions regarding effectiveness. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03301311.
|
© Copyright 2013-2024 GI Health Foundation. All rights reserved.
This site is maintained as an educational resource for US healthcare providers only.
Use of this website is governed by the GIHF terms of use and privacy statement.