Hypnotherapy for Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Type Symptoms in Patients with Quiescent Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

J Crohns Colitis. 2021 Jul 5;15(7):1106-1113. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaa241.

Daniël R Hoekman 1, Arine M Vlieger 2, Pieter C Stokkers 3, Nofel Mahhmod 4, Svend Rietdijk 3, Nanne K de Boer 5, Tim G de Meij 1, Carla Frankenhuis 1, Geert R D'Haens 6, Marc A Benninga 1


Author information

1Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

2Department of Pediatrics, St. Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.

3Department of Gastroenterology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

4Department of Gastroenterology, St. Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.

5Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, AG&M Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

6Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.


Background and aims: Many inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] patients in remission have persisting symptoms, compatible with irritable bowel syndrome [IBS-type symptoms]. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of gut-directed hypnotherapy vs standard medical treatment [SMT] for IBS-type symptoms in IBD patients.

Methods: In this multicentre, randomized, controlled, open-label trial, patients aged 12-65 years with IBD in clinical remission [global assessment] and biochemical remission [faecal calprotectin ≤100 µg/g, or ≤200 µg/g without inflammation at endoscopy] with IBS according to Rome III criteria were randomized to hypnotherapy or SMT. Primary outcome was the proportion with ≥50% reduction on a visual analog scale for symptom severity, as measured with the Irritable Bowel Syndrome Severity Scoring System [IBS-SSS] at week 40 [i.e. 6 months after finishing the intervention], compared to baseline. Secondary outcomes included total IBS-SSS score, quality of life, adequate relief, IBS-related cognitions, and depression and anxiety scores.

Results: Eighty patients were included, of whom 70 received at least one session of the allocated treatment and were included in the modified intention-to-treat-population. Seven patients were excluded because of missing baseline data required for the primary outcome. The primary outcome was met in nine [27%] of 33 patients randomized to SMT and nine [30%] of 30 patients randomized to hypnotherapy [p = 0.81]. Adequate relief was reported in 60% and 40% of subjects, respectively. Exploratory analyses of secondary outcomes revealed no apparent differences between the two treatment groups.

Conclusions: Hypnotherapy was not superior to SMT in the treatment of IBS-type symptoms in IBD patients. Both treatment strategies are reasonable options from a clinical perspective.

© Copyright 2013-2024 GI Health Foundation. All rights reserved.
This site is maintained as an educational resource for US healthcare providers only. Use of this website is governed by the GIHF terms of use and privacy statement.