Abstract

Controlling anal incontinence in women by performing anal exercises with biofeedback or loperamide (CAPABLe) trial: Design and methods

Eric Jelovsek J1, Markland AD2, Whitehead WE3, Barber MD4, Newman DK5, Rogers RG6, Dyer K7, Visco A8, Sung VW9, Sutkin G10, Meikle SF11, Gantz MG12; Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Aug 17. pii: S1551-7144(15)30067-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.08.009. [Epub ahead of print]
 
     
Author information

1Obstetrics, Gynecology & Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH. Electronic address: jelovsj@ccf.org. 2Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL. 3Department of Gastroenterology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. 4Obstetrics, Gynecology & Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH. 5Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 6Department of Obstetrics Gynecology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM; Department of Surgery, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM. 7Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, CA. 8Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC. 9Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI. 10Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA. 11The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. 12RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC.

Abstract

The goals of this trial are to determine the efficacy and safety of two treatments for women experiencing fecal incontinence. First, we aim to compare the use of loperamide to placebo and second, to compare the use of anal sphincter exercises with biofeedback to usual care. The primary outcome is the change from baseline in the St. Mark's (Vaizey) Score 24weeks after treatment initiation. As a Pelvic Floor Disorders Network (PFDN) trial, subjects are enrolling from eight PFDN clinical centers across the United States. A centralized data coordinating center supervises data collection and analysis. These two first-line treatments for fecal incontinence are being investigated simultaneously using a two-by-two randomized factorial design: a medication intervention (loperamide versus placebo) and a pelvic floor strength and sensory training intervention (anal sphincter exercises with manometry-assisted biofeedback versus usual care using an educational pamphlet). Interventionists providing the anal sphincter exercise training with biofeedback have received standardized training and assessment. Symptom severity, diary, standardized anorectal manometry and health-related quality of life outcomes are assessed using validated instruments administered by researchers masked to randomized interventions. Cost effectiveness analyses will be performed using prospectively collected data on care costs and resource utilization. This article describes the rationale and design of this randomized trial, focusing on specific research concepts of interest to researchers in the field of female pelvic floor disorders and all other providers who care for patients with fecal incontinence.

© Copyright 2013-2017 GI Health Foundation. All rights reserved.
This site is maintained as an educational resource for US healthcare providers only. Use of this website is governed by the GIHF terms of use and privacy statement.